Time reversal; a prologue to the Collapse of the Wave Function

Dear reader, the “primo movimento- adagio ma non troppo” first act of the Collapse of the Wave Function, the next entry or near , is done for some time, needs some checking, here is the prologue.It is indirect.
The possible time reversal is not returning from a to b.It is a new intersection.Intersection is the way/method to understand.Observer might interpret it as a partial time reversal, but this is depending from the point of view. It is always c, and this c might be very near a or very far from b, as one wants to see it or it is given by the theory to see it. The point of view.. It is not to be reborn in order to return, it is max. to change state or avoid the probable collision in the time arrow possibility.it is not automatically indeterministic, it is a probable change of direction. What quantum of energy is needed for avoiding the probable event? The collapse of the wave has to be closed and reopened to change the outcome?
Information can not be destroyed; we have to agree first what is information.Is it the appearance in and on which we consider? The information is a way to explain events and is linked to a way to construct events. It is a tautology at the end.The realism lies in the working of a theory.As real as that one can not go further, the contradiction principle prevents more, by WD. Are we talking some constituent of information here, like atom- the non divisible, like the Greek word and philosopher? Or something like a bit? Back to searching the particle of foundation, the god particle?The one particle of foundation? All this while smashing the “matter” in the collider?Theology or metaphysics? Information changes,it decays, it metabolizes into something.So it is lost, irreversibly , as this page will be lost when WD stops to pay for it.. Only some remains will be metabolized in the Presence- read the return of the V`GER.The whole is not reversible, see time reversal.Where does a candle flame go when you blow it out? Nagarjuna and the candle paradox..
When assigning information,we just intersect and operate a grid. And assign value. Instantly all over, depending on the grid.. This grid stays but it is not real in the sense that there is something definitely real outside the human parasite view and understanding for ever, even when it is proven…OR BETTER, HUMAN PARASITE DOES NEED TO KNOW MORE, HE IS DANGEROUS UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE.If the Rutherford atomic model has lead to the atomic bomb, then everything goes, regardless if it is true or false, unless it works.It is as long the grid works and someone operates it. You can change the grid and so the information changes.The consistence of the theory is consisting in its dual consistence of the theory and the observed and that is all. So the black hole is not eating information as we think, it is eating and that is, it is the fun of the quantum world. The decay is a fact.Especially the radiation force where the quantum theory is born.I ching, the book of changes.That the information is unchangeable beats the idea of progress in the science, from the discovery of the wheel onward.It beats the history and it beats the Universe. Something so static can not exist, except in the delusions of the Human Parasite..And if this is the core of the wave function, then it is the same as the Washington consensus in economy. Copenhagen vs Washington, all decaying in the entropic loop.
Or the Open Universe alternative as Popper at the end found it.
Just a few days ago Wd thought of an experiment. He was thinking he is clever.The idea was to freeze the “wave function”! Just some degrees above the absolute zero and see what happens, the time /speed gets slow and we can see live what the wave packet or how would you like to call it does and the collapse will be in a slow motion. Well, Max Planck institute did it ,end of 2016. It showed grains sipping. This is “new”.
The Copenhagen “consensus” (forget about the “interpretation” bit ,it is just more soft way of saying the same) has reached the same end of the road conclusion as the Washington Consensus in economy. Nothing further on is possible.Outrageous, as Karl Popper says.Luckily Karl Popper at the end found out the Open Universe and also that we , the human parasite, have the chance to get Something out of Nothing, even physically speaking.
And here we come to the Washington Consensus trap, or better, crap.