dear reader, never call and give a name to a cat or a dog “Bayesian”
Never embark on vessel or any type of transport called “Bayesian”.
The most interesting thing and this is meant for real, is that the Yacht with this people which sunk in Sicily was named “Bayesian” which is a statement of the business which made this people what they are and that NOT ONE article in the press made the connection why this boat has this statement written on it.
“Karl Popper and David Miller [1983] have argued that there is no such thing as
probabilistic inductive support, as conceived of, for example, in the Bayesian
theory of evidence. A little more specifically, they argue that ‘all probabilistic
support is purely deductive’”
Well, as you know the famous boat “ Bayesian”, worth mega millions made possibly by “ Bayesian” methods of collecting data, making spreadsheets who is who out of the “Bayesian” inferences , spyware, surveillance based on this “inductivistic probability” which means at the end if one has a certain type of face and beard with a particular name attached, like Bin and god forbid if one mentions bienmesabe which is also dangerous,,and if this particular person is moving in an area of “interest” without even knowing this inductivistic places of interest, , by inductivistic method he may end in Guantanamo with great probability! Inductivistically speaking, the orange prisoner robe he will wear there in Guantanamo, is inductivistically- beforehand- proved by his moving and even maybe pronouncing a magic word- bienmesabe, which is a famous “Bayesian” ex post proof of evidence!. Folks , this is not made up, this is exactly how Bayesian works , in famous two levels of proof…
The people , , on the vessel “Bayesian” , were mostly all involved in making “Bayesian” money out of this indictivistic software, markets, bets, gambling, spying, or maybe “bayesianically” not?Haha.
To cut this short, the argument of how to make money in a neoliberal system out of big data, surveillance spyware and all “Bayesian” ramifications of inductivistic many unknowns probabilistic situations by big data analysis, with “bayesian” connections to MI5, 6, 7, GCHQ, YHWH, Moses friends, The whole Gotha of the UK whatever it takes class, Cia, Data Companies, surveillance or statistic analysis of anything , The WHOLE BAYESIAN model fell short on the yacht which drowned somewhere Sicily. The drowning of the vessel named “Bayesian” is the proof that “ Bayesian” model of probability is BOLLOCKS,when the real stuff kicks in. The inductivist method failed , not on the rigged “Bayesian” markets and big data casinos junkyards where the Morgan Stanley and this Englishman from Oxford made their profits, which ballooned so big that they needed to testify and be prosecuted in court for penal offense of ballooning the books, seling to HP the holy grail of bollocks.
A little bit of bad weather and the Whirlwind , a very small cone of circular vaccum cleaner like a small tornado which was even higly probable to form even without the “Bayesian” calculus, sunk the mega million boat. In the whole “bayesian” model of the life they had and lived which the owners and the friends cherished so much, the Real Thing happened .
The “Bayesian” named yacht, the concept , the money out from Bayesian , the whole math backing “Bayesian” the “Bayesian” model of whatever the human monkey thinks how things work in the Universe/Minestrone, sunk in 16 minutes.
Ok, you say Witchdoctor is a Phool, like the inhabitants of the 24th voyage of Ivan Tychy.
It was all a coincidence ???, his pal was run over when jogging by a hit and run driver nowhere seen in the UK a day before, he was with his main, his defense witness, bunch of lawyers with many Western battles behind them from 9.11 on on the same boat drinking champagne, the captain and the crew run away instead of leaving the vessel for last, the doors and vents were left open and the storm water was pouring in, the boat was drifting for 16 minutes, the Windy app WDS knows well for hiking, was showing the storm and the whirlwing chance as the witness there stated, the boat was unsinkable (as titanic was) so the constructor of the vessel said, and the whole ramification of coincidences, like the field of the “bayesian” method involving secret services, big data big companies follow the money suits for billions here and there, AND THE WHOLE INDUCTIVISTIC KNOWLEDGE ON WHICH BAYESIAN IS BASED ON ,,, SUNK. The people there on the vessel even knew the Bayesian method. And they should have known better?
In fact “Bayesian” and inference is like in previous post when your mother leaves her bag in the kitchen and you presume she is home. The only true fact in this story is that the bag is in the kitchen and that “Bayesian” has sunk. All other is bollocks we will never find out as the whole movie set is a Bayesian stage with bunch of pals.
Who knows all about his “Bayesian” Connection? Well that is simple, the “Bayesian” Connection is well known to the members of Bayesian connection themselves. And this knowledge is not Bayesian probabilistic statistic but a hard proof of connections between themselves.
The movie out of this Bayesian script, sadly John le Carre’ left us, has to be played by a famous actor, as Witchlady is demanding – Jean DuJardin.
Something of Peter Sellers mix between Chauncey Gardner and Inspector Clouseau. Jean DuJardin has to have a role, a big one in this Bayesian connection, if not, without him the whole plot will look completely unlikely.
Conclusion: Do not call your cat Bayesian.
PS; this text is, strangely enough, a Prologue for the Universe is a Minestrone part two. Quantum and Bayesian are sort of bastard brothers, Bayesian being a state of knowledge ( inductivistic my ass sort of mishmash) as we have seen above in this Guantanamo case study, hahaha, and the soup is cooking… in part two, which, by the way, is focused on another, much bigger topic of the “accidental” failure of the standard model of physics made by the hand of today physics and it it is not even theorized or postulated or computed!
By Witchdoctor