There are two ways to confront the Humane pervert with the AI. One is to learn how the AI has the ontological impossibility to be anything near objective and or real and the other is to disrupt the AI with the same ontological tools .
Merriam Webster; Ontology: a branch of metaphysics concerned with the nature and relations of being.
Lets start with the Bible, not because it is holy, but because is a historic compendium of human pervert being on earth: There are two sides of everything, the left and the taken. So, folks, it is a decision which makes the meaning.
In this real sense any algorithm is FAKE. IT TAKES SIDES. It has to choose and decide, even if it works on quantum probabilistic principle, which means it is only an agent. Any kind of Algorithm, generative or not, is essentially void and fake, like anything that human pervert thinks about the reality.
There are some , to Witchdoctor knowledge, Insurmontable laws- to great to be overcome- and principles which shows the emptiness of any solid foundations of anything, especially of the Parrot AI.
Apart from the Chinese AI and more hidden, the West AI, being based on some rules like never say anything bad about socialism or any other principles, the AI can be dismantled easily with this tools. Yes, one has to learn to use them.
Nagarjuna dialectics. Showing the impossibility of self standing foundation of any proposition. The foundations are seemingly true only if linked to a whole mess of others, but in fact it is all a house of cards.
Zen dialectics. The same as above.
Any good Sophist argument will do. To apply the Achilles and the turtle paradox method or any Zeno paradox in interaction with the Parrot AI, which has no real notion of space and time and by cutting any logical sequence like salami will suffice to make him go in tilt. No wonder AI and his owners are hallucinating. Hallucinating is the core of the AI algorithm.
The Chinese school of Names. An ancient philosophic current, The Logicians. Together with Zuanghzi. The proposition ; “White Horse” is not a “Horse” shows the real ontological aporia leading sooner or later to antinomy. The problem of semantics, of the context and the hidden ties, all easily dismantled.
The search for true context is the lost cause because it all stands on shifting sands, because with any of the above methods it can be proven false, and the AI is essentially junk.
Ludwig Wittgenstein on limits of language and these being the limits of world etcetera, to the final silence.
The proposition of logical empirism, positivism , etc; “any proposition that can be proven is true” sounds so good, except that this proposition can not be proved within it or by any means… so, it is false.
The tautology.
Essentially the Parrot AI has embedded the same lack of foundation per se as the human pervert has. No Nazi back to the roots bullshit will save you, because there is none, except if enforced with violence and terror, or greed. Then it becomes real, as any nightmare.
The spacetime diagrams
If one asserts that time is function of space or any Minkowski. Lorentz ( confuted here some time ago) diagrams, one is way out of the line.
Time is a function of space and space is a function of time, so, a diagram is in fact unachievable. It is a gross approximation. Or maybe even worse. The approximation of Universe is a distorted lens of the point of view. Time as a function of space and space as a function of time are human made. There can not be proof that they exist for real, outside the brain construction of a walking body. Did your ancestors told you what happened after they passed away?
This is a final question of antinomy. Same goes for AI.
So, the answers are purely in the zeitgeist of the persons who ask and of the persons who make it behind the scenes. It is POLITICAL, as is all.
Fast is , the Ai. You can write your diplomas or anything with it. They are worth , hm, for as much you can sell them, which means, nothing real at the end, except that you get paid. But only if somebody buys it. Simple.