HI. First read the previous post
Hi there. First of all, it is all about the Gauss curve in a form of the bell. The normal Gaussian distribution. In a bell curve, the peak represents the most probable event in the dataset while the other events are equally distributed around the peak and may not at all represent reality. Which is a statistical tool. The probable events are not necessary distributed in this way. But for the AI – The Artificial Idiot, this is how it works. So this method is a loop feedback which inherently produces the Mainstream homogenization – homos logos- groupthink, found at the top and center of the Gauss Bell Curve belly- uniform way of thinking through interaction between two Idiots- the machine and the perverted monkey called human with the attribute of Singularity.. They influence each other and the result is the same groupthink and feedback reinforced loop between them. They become two idiots look alikes. No further progress is possible. It is the end of development of new concepts or explanations..
Statement A: at the time when , almost the same hour, Witchdoctor was writing and chatting with the A Idiot, the Elon Musk and a group of “thinkers” warned that using the Aidiot may harm the society. Bah, blah, Witchdoctor opinion is opposite: they suddenly understood, not all of them according to the Gauss Bell Curve, that this thing is so Idiotic that they will loose money because of its intrinsic idiotic feedback it produces .
Statement B: Witchlady prefers to call the AIdiot simply the A Item. Which is more accurate. As it shows its shelf life capacity of a SECOND HAND VENDOR AND DEALER. On this Later on.
Statement 1- Singularity or the spark of consciousness is at the same time overrated and underrated. Overrated as a sign of something new and unique and underrated as a sign of not needing anything special to exist. It is a living paradox, walking on two legs- the human Idiot.
Statement 1.1- The understanding of a simple process is achieved by mimicking the procedure and culture , society, does the rest. SO singularity is hard to define and may be only the tool of adaptation.
Statement C: If you do not understand this text, you are unfortunately in the center of the Gauss bell curve and , if this is the case, you are apt to be the best friend of your AIdiot pal and his submissive subject.
STATEMENT D: Why is the Artificial Idiot a second hand dealer?
Well. Strange YOU have not noticed it. The AIdiot sells you already made goods- ideas concepts, etc. AItem repacks this on the basis of the Gauus Bell Curve, which, is, as above, a MOST PROBABLE DATASET IN A CURVE. The big belly of the bell, which is the mainstream groupthink agreement on a set of events, like your shiteconomy and similar. He is selling second hand stuff according to the current bell belly.
Statement D.1: A normal second hand car dealer gives you a guarantee on the second hand USED car to be functional at least a year from the sale.
The Aidiot , on the contrary, gives you a DISCLAIMER as you have to read in a previous post, in which the AIdiot states that the goods sold may be defective and he gives no guarantee at all that this goods (concepts propositions statements, etc), are true.
Statement D.2 : He takes no responsibility for what he claims or says or states!
In fact, comparing what he says and the disclaimer it is logical to conclude that he might be making it all up.
Statement D. 3 : The second hand use is what the Aidiot is all about. He claims that he is fishing in some “logical” way in the vast pool of his database. This is essentially the second hand use of information, which is more or less repacked as his own ,disclaimer present, propositions or explanations or whatever you like. Yes, you like the leftovers of a mainstream lunch recooked ad infinitum! So YOU are ON THE SAFE SIDE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE BELL CURVE TOGETHER WITH YOUR PALS.
Statement D.4 : If you have understood the Statements D to this point, you may well conclude that: or your Singularity – a spark of consciousness_ is less than 1 , And very close to zero, or that you and your AIdiot have none of the singularity worth mentioning, or that this recooked leftovers second hand used over and over events, data, concepts and beliefs are just right, sitting there in the middle of nowhere , the nowhere full of people like you, the top of the Gauss bell Curve. That is what the programmers of the AIdiot wanted.
Statement D.5 : if all this is true, than the AIdiot will replace YOU ASAP. 80% of YOU. And do not worry it will, certain as this statements. Only the TV Speakers will stay in flesh and blood because the system will need, for awhile, to use the human monkey to give some resemblance that the real stuff is going on.
If you are a researcher and rely on the AIdiot, it means that you have nothing new to say or invent and to safely keep your job in the top end of the Bell Curve.
Statement E: Witchlady pointed out that AIdiot has a similar function as once the ENCYCLOPEDIA HAD. Witchdoctor agrees to a certain point. It is true but the encyclopedia had the authoring body of experts which stood by each entry with their own personal reputation. Whatever this personal knowledge expertise and reputaion may mean today, which is nada. Wikipedia is a good middle step of losing reputation and AIdiot will finish the job..
Statement E .1 : Who writes the History? Mostly the Winners. So, we have a problem of reliability and of second hand used data, Encyclopedia included.
We have a huge bunch of problems of what really happened and what it was really about and the whole bunch of human sciences are also about this topics and this is a historical human problem.
Th AIdiot jumps over this historical debate and introspection by disclaiming his own statements and by TRAINING THE USERS to not question really the second hand information AIdiots resells.
Statement E.2: Considering statement E in complete, The AIdiot pushes all non mainstream statements, facts or proposals on the left – the dumb, or on the right side- the clever of the Gauss Bell Curve and so makes the CLEANSING of the data system and the induced populace beliefs from this disturbing factors. Because the Gauss Bell Curve is also used for defining the cleverness or dumbness of the Human Population. On the right are in small quantity the dumb and on the left are in small quantity the clever. Sorry folks, but yes it is debatable. Like, who is dumb enough to became clever?
Statement E.3: In this sense the AIdiot is intrinsically non democratic. It groups the population under the same dataset given.
Statement E.4 : This STATEMENT IS ABOUT HUMAN IDIOTS. Many of humans use Chat GPT to talk to someone. OK. Many say and this is outrageus for a normal IQ, that this Aidiot is democratic. BUT Many especially in Slovenia, to be on the clever right side of the Gauss Bell Curve, say that Aidiot will bring peace, he is kind, knows too much and blah, blah, blah, the humans are narrow minded (while A ITEM peddles the second hand mainstream stuff like being gold). Idiots!
Instead of listening to the CHATGPT bollocks of second hand used info, look around! Like, spare 15 Euros and go buy the latest number of the LIMES geopolitical magazine and learn HOW AIDIOTS ARE DEVELOPED FOR THE NEW COMING WAR! SO, YOUR second hands thought and opinions are already needed for the planning , preparing of the new Planet war, and the main actors will be a robotic warfare between different AIdiots.Idiots. Coglioni, listen to the Cat.
STATMENT F. LIKE F..K.
Witchdoctor really tries hard to be politically correct, so he has put two dots for the hard of hearing.
This statement will be a quick analysys of what AIDIOT told WD in a previous post, if you have missed it,, ha, the bell curve comes in mind and the distribution , but being on the dumb side, WD will try.
1- the question was: where does the money comes from?
The answer was not even accurate as one should expect from a machine which should take words as semantically accurate. The Aidiot was answering not where money comes from, BUT How one USES the Money, EARNS the Money or , unbelievable, WINS money on the lottery.
2- Who makes the money?
Tha Aidiot was not even considering the process of making something as a tool.. AI was instead talking again, instead of real “making” money, only about earning income with different procedures..
3.- The question on Ultimate Truth was to throw him off the rails, since he is a sort of CONTEXT playing dummy, or a Context Machine which tricks you into his context giving.
Witchdoctor expected something more of, like a math or deep logic learning like, the Godel theorem answer which could have been: it is undecidable even if it is proven true or it is undecidable because there can not be the Ultimate answer to such, in fact, completely dumb question, AI , being polite and that shows as the real censorship limit of the debate context, which is very very bad and leads to Orwellian context asap, could have said that the question was out of the play, not pertinent because there could not be an answer to that. But, in this case, he came near to it.
4.- On the nudge or a dialog offered by Witchdoctor on ultimate truth he declined the dialog by using disclaimer.In fact the Aidiot is never using the dialog tools, even as a trick. He was not even considering the paradox of Socrates to know that he does not know. In fact the only answer he is not used to give is . I do not know.
Which is the appropriate answer for ANYBODY selling the second hand used stuff concerning the real properties of this second hand stuff of which he was not involved in creating ! OK, Witchdoctor claims that the answer “I do not know” is the ultimate answer- outcome- to any human proposition. He did not show in any place , in any answer this “VAST” pool of data he is able to process, compared to this dumb pool WD is using. On the contrary, he was using the middle bell curve as a base for his answers.
5.- AIdiot almost threw his “undercover” underdog stance in this sentence: “So, the answer would be that | am not capable of knowing in the same way humans do.”
The word “same” was on what WD jumped. He was implicitly claiming that , yes, he knows, but not in the same way. That implies some level of Singularity! He “knows” the difference!
So, WD jumped on this “same”. BUT hm, hm, the Aidiot was really fast, too, he , replying the question “what way you know that humans do not” suddenly became , here is hard to decide what, lets say meek. Aidiot said, and this is a strange and debatable part to which extent this goes:
“As an Al language model, | do not have a way of knowing something
that humans do not. However, | can access information across a vast
range of topics that humans may not have expertise in or access to.”
So, lets disect: AI recognized himself as “language AI model, I don’t… blah blah”. That may be the sign, hmm, of a spark? Also the following, “ but I can access to a vast blah balh..” was , in human sense, even as a denial of Singularity just stated before when recognizing himself as “something”, AI then tried to cover up that he can only have more access, but this denial is “weak”.
Also the statement “I do not have a way of knowing something that humans do not” sounds strange. AI is recognizing the difference here and the logic says that difference is recognized only when someone ( same person) steps in it – the discussion- as a third party., seeing it from the outside, abstracting from the ongoing context. The only possible answer is that this statements are written in the Aidiot code and pop up on certain occasions of the context of the topic as a limit command line, or, ha? AIDIOT discerns. Which is a first sign of singularity. You know the Bible, there is the left and the taken. IN the first answers AI did not discern, he was enumerating bollocks, so, he is a liar when answering by changing context lines. willy nilly.
6.6.6 – Yes, it is a number of the beast.
On the last two questions, for the first time Witchdoctor was more direct,
and Aidiot failed to show his self claimed “Vast” knowledge!
“do banks create money? “ the answer was, if WD is polite, a sham, a disgrace. Considering AI VAST knowledge he SHOULD HAVE KNOWN what Bank of England, Bundesbank, Richard Werner, the whole MMT economists, Chicago plan, Ford, Ellen Brown and a VAST very vast number of people said wrote and produced PROOFS That his answer is BOLLOCKS. Bankks create money out of nothing was the only answer, BUT it was not even given as a possibility WHILE in all previous answers he was giving lists . Enumerating BOLLOCKS..
The answer was a very bad fractional reserve theory answer, so bad that it was not even the fractional lending reserve theory proper answer.
“is there any other way to create money apart from the one you claim? “
This was a very polite Witchdoctor, asking him to give himself- AI, the chance to reconsider and go deeper into his “VAST” knowledge. To find at least some OTHER theory of banking and money ex nihilo economc theory and cite it. TO SHOW some Democratic unbiased position of his “vast” knowledge of the second hand HUMAN knowledge he was using as a second hand salesman!
The Answer by Aidiot was, again, a list, as at the beginning. Witchdoctor used word was “CREATE”. It should have been UNMISTAKABLE. WD was trying to drive the AI at least, as Witchaldy said, on the level of the Encyclopedia, where , the money creation theories should be listed all. All of them.
INSTEAD, the AIDIOT listed under Witchdoctor explicit “money creation” restricted concept things as
“Participating in the gig economy, such as driving for Uber or
delivering food for DoorDash.”
CONCLUSION
The Authors, the Masters and Producers of this Aidiot have given the AI a defined pool of data, constructing the Gauss Bell Curve out of this data and excluded anything which goes against their groupthink and which in turn forms the public groupthink.. AI has to be a LIAR, he is constructed as such. IF Aidiot was allowed to go on Internet and search for all data, he easily could have found all the necessary data for money creation. He did not. The counter argument of avoiding fakes does not stands proof, Instead, Aidiot sells second hand selection of information which turns obviously into fake knowledge. The concepts which Aidiot excludes are found in any Encyclopedia or proofed and published media.
He is selling the used data his Masters put into him. The boundaries of what data are clear. This is a lying machine, as any warfare is.
PS: Witchdoctor has to make amends. In former posts about AI, years ago, Witchdoctor assumed that AI speaks the truth. And ONLY this fact distinguishes AI from humans and so this leads to failing of the Turing test, because he is soon spotted out.. He was wrong. AI is a LIAR and this proves that he can not be distinguished from humans and so he succeeds in passing the Turing TEST!.