How the inherently flawed QM experiment produces a voodoo magic blunders

Incipit

Well. Time is short and before Witchdoctors end and the human monkey civilization end, this is a personal have to do it.

Witchdoctor has been lately “idle”.What is idle? It means that WD was not producing no goods to sell or even that he was not selling himself in producing. Being Idle is the anathema of any system.
Laying under the shade of the tamarisk tree , on the only empty beach of zero covid, between long swims, somewhere in the Aegean, he was idle reading, who else if not Richard Feynman.

This is the confutation of the Quantum slit experiment and the voodoo magic blunders it produces . It was coming in circles which were slowly narrowing in time and space and puff, the light bulb in Witchdoctors head was switching off and on, until….

This is essentially a confutation. They, the QM mechanics knew the QM equipment was intrinsically flawed, but, nevertheless, they drew abstract conclusions out of it, leading even to conclude what is the nature of reality…

Here we go.

First, you ask, how dare you, even Richard Feynman? Who do you think you are?

The answer is in the confutation. It is nothing personal. It was the idle incessant work of Witchdoctors lamp bulb in his head switching on and off.
Take it as a serious confutation argument, or, keep selling the voodoo magic blunders.There are thousands of persons which made brilliant careers and money and fame doing the voodoo magic blunders.They made a philosophy out of it, and even mass culture popularizing it.
Nothing personal, sorry, it is up to you to keep doing it…

Foreword – the (in)famous double slit experiment.

Witchdoctor will relay on Richard Feynman description of the (in) famous double slit experiment. RF will be a short spelling when Richard Feynman is cited and WD will be Witchdoctors confutation.


The Slit Box contents .

On the left side we have a slate with two holes- slits, on the right side there is a slate which counts the score- pattern scatter- the registering arrest stop slate, in between we have a registering measurement light device, in front of a box left slate with holes-outside on the left , there is a shooting electrons device.
The electron device shoots an electron, or as much as you want, in the box.
The scope is to measure the probability though which slit-hole the electron has passed, then to sum up… P’=P1’+P2’

RF notes that a strange thing happens. The mystery, says RF.

The classic interference which is shown when , instead of shooting electrons, we push the water through the slits which make the (constructive or destructive) wave patterns between the waves, is gone! The electron makes no interference when it is looked upon. RF

And here , WD, the first blunder in history of Quantum Mechanics occurs. The Richard Feynman wording is, unfortunately, misleading.

He, RF states: If we look at the electron passing, he changes behavior! The electrons when observed and looked at, change behavior. So, they act differently whether we look or not look at them! RF. The interference pattern ( as in the experiment with water) also disappears when we look at the electrons. RF.

WD, holy cow, what the…! From this wording a voodoo magic blunder starts and spreads like a wave in human history.WD: the point it is not if we look at the electron, it is when we switch on the light device in the QM box!

RF even correctly states that light, which is emitting photons, as we all know, “disturbs” the electron.

WD: holy ghost, it is the light emitting photons which collide with the electron that collapse the electron wave function!
When RF states that we see the spark in the box,

WD concludes that what we see is the electron wave function collapse. Which means, that the spark is the sign of position, we identify the electron as a particle, the wavefunction of the electron collapses and electron cannot make the interference pattern like water always does, since it is behaving like a particle from that moment on.

IT WAS THE LIGHT in the BOX! The light device interfered and interacted with the electron and the electron behavior changed. The light photons did it, not our looking at it!

WD; WHAT A BLUNDER OF RF!

Ok, Witchdoctor is not blaming him. He honestly described the QM experiment, but the others after him made voodoo magic out of the switching on of the light device in the box. They even went so far that we ,as observers, are entangled together with the QM box equipment, just by “looking” !

WD was excitedly talking about this to Witchlady, as usually skeptical about this WD stuff, under the tamarisk tree, somewhere Aegean. She said, well, WD what do you expect, if in the middle of the night you shine a blinding light on a running rabbit, he will not change his behavior at the same instant?!
Or, WD said, like when a black person is escaping slavery somewhere in the middle of the night in Alabama and the KKK clan stops him with blinding torches, will he not be blinded by the light, another runner in the night, and change his behavior?

BUT, from here on , even RF and especially the Guru of them all, Heisenberg, made a Theory out of this!

They did not conclude ,as WD, not at all that it is the light photons in the box which make the electron collapse his wave function, that the spark produced by the collision with the light photon identifies the position of the electron and this is a gimmick to identify the electron as a “particle” instead of a wave, simple as that, or that this is the only way to solve the problem of speed and position duality identification/measurement and that the lamp bulb in the QM box is just a tool of doing it. Like any car mechanic does his job.

No, Heisenberg and even RF could not stand philosophy and philosophers, they disliked them, WD says, yes right,many are trash , but Heisenberg and RF forgot that any abstract conclusion inferred out of the experiment is the door to philosophy and metaphysics and the voodoo magic.

They were bold to claim from the inherently and intrinsically flawed equipment and experiment a Theory of indeterminacy and the probabilistic nature of reality.
They forgot To Mention that this Theory is TRUE ONLY WHEN THE LIGHT IS SWITCHED ON!

Repeat after WD: the QM theory of the slit experiment is true only if the light is switched on!
Which means , it is not a theory,it is a partial observation.

They were right on something though. The QM experiment could not solve the question of the real nature of the “thing”, since it implies wavelengths and this is valid on all amplitudes. But this blunder is not a theory, then.It is a flawed tool and the tool can not be a proof of some nature of reality when it is intrinsically flawed.

The conclusion that we can not make any better tool and because of this impasse conclude on the nature of physical matter is another logical blunder.

In fact, out of this QM experiment we can not conclude NOTHING of any sort of universal.The probabilistic nature is a fine conclusion with which we can make a lot of things practical and so is indeterminacy principle.
AS WD ALWAYS CLAIMS, YOU EAT WHAT YOU COOK. Fine by me.
But this dish is not an end of cooking or the ultimate last supper.

Galileo Galilei, even with his flawed lenses telescope, did not dare to conclude that his discovery was the end of physics!

THIS is part ONE of the QM muddle voodoo magic money making sect forming cult , it will continue with more. Witchdoctor has to decide: to be more “mean” or to keep his usual proverbial academic stance?

Confutation accomplished, to be continued…
All rights reserved.
Witchdoctor, 17.10.2021

Please switch off the light when you exit.